Aftab Aalam vs state of bihar — 353/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),324(4),351(2),334(1),329(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
B.P - BAIL PETITION
CNR: BRWC100026822026
Filing Number
2554/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
353/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
660
Police Station
Ramnagar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aftab Aalam
Adv. SRI ABHISHEK KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Aftab Alam in a case involving alleged armed robbery and assault of a godown, finding no specific allegation of assault against him and noting the injured victim's injuries were classified as simple. The court directed his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, considering the property dispute backdrop and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
-
06-Apr-2026
Order
District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
-
01-Apr-2026
Order
District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 353/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Aftab Alam in a case involving alleged armed robbery and assault of a godown, finding no specific allegation of assault against him and noting the injured victim's injuries were classified as simple. The court directed his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, considering the property dispute backdrop and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts