Munendra kumar bharti vs state of bihar — 351/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(2),112,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

B.P - BAIL PETITION

CNR: BRWC100026662026

Filing Number

2538/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

351/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

Cyber Bagaha

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(2),112,3(5)
I.t. Act 2000 Section 66c,66d

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Munendra kumar bharti

    Adv. MD.KAMRAN AZIZ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Munendra Kumar Bharti's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The court found direct allegations that Bharti's bank account was used for fraudulent transactions worth approximately Rs. 26 lakhs, multiple passbooks and ATM cards in others' names were recovered from his possession, and he allegedly colluded with co-accused in committing cyber fraud. Despite Bharti's claim of innocence and that co-accused Abhishek misused his credentials, the court declined bail citing ongoing investigation and the gravity of the organized fraud conspiracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 351/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Munendra Kumar Bharti's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The court found direct allegations that Bharti's bank account was used for fraudulent transactions worth approximately Rs. 26 lakhs, multiple passbooks and ATM cards in others' names were recovered from his possession, and he allegedly colluded with co-accused in committing cyber fraud. Despite Bharti's claim of innocence and that co-accused Abhishek misused his credentials, the court declined bail citing ongoing investigation and the gravity of the organized fraud conspiracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case