Amirullah khan vs state of bihar — 348/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

B.P - BAIL PETITION

CNR: BRWC100026562026

Filing Number

2528/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

348/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

Cyber Bagaha

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),3(5)
I.t. Act 2000 Section 66c,66d

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amirullah khan

    Adv. MD.KAMRAN AZIZ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 348/2026 Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Amirullah Khan's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The court found that multiple bank accounts in Khan's and his wife's names were recovered, multiple NCRP complaints existed against these accounts, and Khan's confessional statement disclosed his involvement in the alleged cyber fraud scheme. The court determined that ongoing investigation and material evidence on record warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 348/2026 Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Amirullah Khan's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The court found that multiple bank accounts in Khan's and his wife's names were recovered, multiple NCRP complaints existed against these accounts, and Khan's confessional statement disclosed his involvement in the alleged cyber fraud scheme. The court determined that ongoing investigation and material evidence on record warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case