Brijesh ram, Manju devi and Kedar ram vs state of bihar — 160/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),126(2),115(2),109,121(1),121(2),132,324(2),74,351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRWC100022372026
Filing Number
2122/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
160/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Laukariya
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Brijesh ram, Manju devi and Kedar ram
Adv. SRI MRITHUNJAY KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Order
The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Brijesh Ram, Manju Devi, and Kedar Ram, who faced charges of assaulting on-duty police personnel during a disturbance in village Gobarahiya on 11.01.2026. The court found the allegations were vague and general without specific details, no injury reports to corroborate claims, and noted that co-accused persons had already been granted bail, while the petitioners had no criminal antecedents of similar nature. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 160/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Brijesh Ram, Manju Devi, and Kedar Ram, who faced charges of assaulting on-duty police personnel during a disturbance in village Gobarahiya on 11.01.2026. The court found the allegations were vague and general without specific details, no injury reports to corroborate claims, and noted that co-accused persons had already been granted bail, while the petitioners had no criminal antecedents of similar nature. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts