Imaran ansari vs state of bihar — 157/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,82(1),352,351(1),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 11th June 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRWC100022222026
Filing Number
2109/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
157/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
13-IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
Bagaha Mahila Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Imaran ansari
Adv. ANIRUDH YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Bail
Case 157/2026 Summary The court dismissed Imran Ansari's interim bail application on June 11, 2026, finding that the petitioner's advocate had been absent for an extended period, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the application. The court concluded there was no genuine interest in proceeding and therefore dismissed the petition on this procedural ground. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Disposed
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
23-May-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
04-May-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
02-May-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
IV District And Additional Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 157/2026
Case 157/2026 Summary The court dismissed Imran Ansari's interim bail application on June 11, 2026, finding that the petitioner's advocate had been absent for an extended period, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the application. The court concluded there was no genuine interest in proceeding and therefore dismissed the petition on this procedural ground. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts