Vishal ram vs state of bihar — 217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th May 2026.

B.P - BAIL PETITION

CNR: BRWC100018202026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1726/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

Decision Date

12th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

380

Police Station

Ramnagar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6)

Petitioner(s)

Vishal ram

Adv. SHRI RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD

Respondent(s)

state of bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

12-05-2026

Disposed

06-05-2026

ORDER

04-05-2026

HEARING

25-04-2026

HEARING

21-04-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-05-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Vishal Ram v. State of Bihar (217/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Vishal Ram's bail petition in connection with a June 2025 armed home invasion case where he allegedly broke into the complainant's house at night with a co-accused carrying a knife and country-made pistol, assaulted the homeowner and his wife when they refused to hand over cash and ornaments, and caused injuries. The court found sufficient evidence including direct allegations in the FIR, eyewitness identification, CCTV footage showing the accused breaking the door and entering the bedroom, injury reports confirming multiple injuries on both victims, witness statements from multiple case diary paragraphs, and the petitioner's involvement in two other criminal cases, thereby determining the nature and gravity of the offence warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vishal Ram v. State of Bihar (217/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Vishal Ram's bail petition in connection with a June 2025 armed home invasion case where he allegedly broke into the complainant's house at night with a co-accused carrying a knife and country-made pistol, assaulted the homeowner and his wife when they refused to hand over cash and ornaments, and caused injuries. The court found sufficient evidence including direct allegations in the FIR, eyewitness identification, CCTV footage showing the accused breaking the door and entering the bedroom, injury reports confirming multiple injuries on both victims, witness statements from multiple case diary paragraphs, and the petitioner's involvement in two other criminal cases, thereby determining the nature and gravity of the offence warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Bagha Sub Div. Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case