Vishal ram vs state of bihar — 217/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th May 2026.
B.P - BAIL PETITION
CNR: BRWC100018202026
Filing Number
1726/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
217/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
380
Police Station
Ramnagar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishal ram
Adv. SHRI RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD
Respondent(s)
state of bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | ORDER |
| 04-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 21-04-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Vishal Ram v. State of Bihar (217/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Vishal Ram's bail petition in connection with a June 2025 armed home invasion case where he allegedly broke into the complainant's house at night with a co-accused carrying a knife and country-made pistol, assaulted the homeowner and his wife when they refused to hand over cash and ornaments, and caused injuries. The court found sufficient evidence including direct allegations in the FIR, eyewitness identification, CCTV footage showing the accused breaking the door and entering the bedroom, injury reports confirming multiple injuries on both victims, witness statements from multiple case diary paragraphs, and the petitioner's involvement in two other criminal cases, thereby determining the nature and gravity of the offence warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Vishal Ram v. State of Bihar (217/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Vishal Ram's bail petition in connection with a June 2025 armed home invasion case where he allegedly broke into the complainant's house at night with a co-accused carrying a knife and country-made pistol, assaulted the homeowner and his wife when they refused to hand over cash and ornaments, and caused injuries. The court found sufficient evidence including direct allegations in the FIR, eyewitness identification, CCTV footage showing the accused breaking the door and entering the bedroom, injury reports confirming multiple injuries on both victims, witness statements from multiple case diary paragraphs, and the petitioner's involvement in two other criminal cases, thereby determining the nature and gravity of the offence warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts