Manohar sahani and five others vs state of bihar — 129/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),118(1),109(1),303(2),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRWC100016702026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1586/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
129/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
Piprasi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manohar sahani and five others
Adv. SHRI SHAILESH KUMAR TIWARI
Ghutani devi alias Dhuran devi
Mohan sahani alias mohan mallah
rajan sahani alias rajan kumar
Lalsa devi
Lalan sahani alias lalan mallah
Respondent(s)
state of bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bagaha, granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners accused of assaulting Subhash Sahani in a land dispute case. The court found the assault allegations were general and non-specific, and considered the underlying land dispute context, ruling the petitioners eligible for bail. They were directed to furnish a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each, with conditions against illegal activities, witness tampering, and requiring cooperation in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bagaha, granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners accused of assaulting Subhash Sahani in a land dispute case. The court found the assault allegations were general and non-specific, and considered the underlying land dispute context, ruling the petitioners eligible for bail. They were directed to furnish a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each, with conditions against illegal activities, witness tampering, and requiring cooperation in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts