Arbind singh, anil singh, bipin singh, ajay singh, ravi singh vs state of bihar — 18/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 18th April 2026.
CRI REV - CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: BRWC100014412026
Filing Number
1380/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arbind singh, anil singh, bipin singh, ajay singh, ravi singh
Adv. Sri Ramesh Kumar Pandey
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 18/2026 Summary The court allowed the petitioners' plea challenging an allegedly illegal detention order (Circular 373/2025) issued by Bihar authorities. The court found the detention order violated procedural safeguards and ruled that the state must release the detainees or proceed through proper legal channels, directing authorities to comply with constitutional detention procedures within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2026
Case 18/2026 Summary The court allowed the petitioners' plea challenging an allegedly illegal detention order (Circular 373/2025) issued by Bihar authorities. The court found the detention order violated procedural safeguards and ruled that the state must release the detainees or proceed through proper legal channels, directing authorities to comply with constitutional detention procedures within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts