Munna Yadav vs Lal Bahadur Yadav Advocate - sri — 72/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

SESSIONS CASE

CNR: BRWC100011122023

Filing Number

1111/2023

Filing Date

13-Feb-2023

Registration No

72/2023

Registration Date

13-Feb-2023

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

150

Police Station

Ramnagar

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Munna Yadav

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lal Bahadur Yadav Advocate - sri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 72/2023: Munna Yadav v. Lal Bahadur Yadav – Summary Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Lal Bahadur Yadav, Mantu Yadav, and Suraj Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506 read with section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution's two eyewitnesses, during cross-examination, admitted critical inconsistencies: they could not see who actually inflicted injuries, made contradictory statements about the circumstances, and acknowledged settlement between parties. In the absence of credible, consistent evidence proving the accusations beyond reasonable doubt, the court applied the legal principle that benefit of doubt must go to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  11. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  14. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  15. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  16. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  17. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  18. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  19. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  20. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  21. 01-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  22. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  23. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  24. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  25. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  26. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence

  27. 18-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  28. 19-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  29. 26-May-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  30. 02-May-2023

    Charge

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  31. 23-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 13-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 72/2023: Munna Yadav v. Lal Bahadur Yadav – Summary Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Lal Bahadur Yadav, Mantu Yadav, and Suraj Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506 read with section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution's two eyewitnesses, during cross-examination, admitted critical inconsistencies: they could not see who actually inflicted injuries, made contradictory statements about the circumstances, and acknowledged settlement between parties. In the absence of credible, consistent evidence proving the accusations beyond reasonable doubt, the court applied the legal principle that benefit of doubt must go to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case