Vijay yadav vs state of bihar — 131/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),109,126(2),308(2),191,190. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
B.P - BAIL PETITION
CNR: BRWC100010522026
Filing Number
1009/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
131/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
72
Police Station
Bhairoganj
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vijay yadav
Adv. SHRI SHAILESH KUMAR TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Vijay Yadav, who was accused of assaulting someone during a land dispute, after he had spent about two months in judicial custody. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering the custody tenure and case circumstances despite the prosecution's opposition based on grievous injury allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
24-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 131/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Vijay Yadav, who was accused of assaulting someone during a land dispute, after he had spent about two months in judicial custody. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering the custody tenure and case circumstances despite the prosecution's opposition based on grievous injury allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts