Jay prakash vishal and Ved prakash vishal vs state of bihar — 11/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRI REV - CRIMINAL REVISION

CNR: BRWC100009422026

Filing Number

901/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jay prakash vishal and Ved prakash vishal

    Adv. SRI INDU BHUSHAN PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY The court set aside the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order directing lock removal and property possession restoration to the petitioners, holding the magistrate exceeded his jurisdiction under B.N.S.S. Section 126/163, which permits only preventive measures in genuine emergencies. The case involved a property dispute where the magistrate failed to establish imminent danger or public peace threat and did not determine actual possession before ordering enforcement, making the order unsustainable and requiring remand for fresh proceedings with proper hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court set aside the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order directing lock removal and property possession restoration to the petitioners, holding the magistrate exceeded his jurisdiction under B.N.S.S. Section 126/163, which permits only preventive measures in genuine emergencies. The case involved a property dispute where the magistrate failed to establish imminent danger or public peace threat and did not determine actual possession before ordering enforcement, making the order unsustainable and requiring remand for fresh proceedings with proper hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case