Punam Kumari vs Birendra Sah and Others — 1500/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),85,352,351(4). Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed u/s 203 cr.p.c. on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRWC020034702024
Filing Number
3470/2024
Filing Date
23-Jul-2024
Registration No
1500/2024
Registration Date
23-Jul-2024
Court
CJM Div. Bettiah
Judge
12-S.D.J.M.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed u/s 203 cr.p.c.
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Punam Kumari
Adv. MURARI SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Birendra Sah and Others
-
2.Prayag Sah
-
3.Gyanti Devi
-
4.Ajay Sah
-
5.Shobha Devi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order in criminal caseView PDF
Summary: The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint petition filed by Poonam Devi against Virendra Sah under Section 226 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the complainant repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple opportunities and court directions, did not produce or examine any witnesses in support of her case, and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the matter, thereby lacking sufficient supporting evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
S.D.J.M.
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
09-Jan-2026
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
19-Nov-2025
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
08-Sep-2025
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
18-Jul-2025
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
18-Jun-2025
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
19-May-2025
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
17-Mar-2025
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
09-Jan-2025
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
07-Dec-2024
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
20-Sep-2024
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
16-Aug-2024
Hearing
S.D.J.M.
-
23-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1500/2024
Summary: The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint petition filed by Poonam Devi against Virendra Sah under Section 226 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the complainant repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple opportunities and court directions, did not produce or examine any witnesses in support of her case, and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the matter, thereby lacking sufficient supporting evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts