Punam Kumari vs Birendra Sah and Others — 1500/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),85,352,351(4). Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed u/s 203 cr.p.c. on 10th March 2026.

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: BRWC020034702024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3470/2024

Filing Date

23-07-2024

Registration No

1500/2024

Registration Date

23-07-2024

Court

CJM Div. Bettiah

Judge

12-S.D.J.M.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed u/s 203 cr.p.c.

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),85,352,351(4)
Dowry Prohibition (D.P) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

Punam Kumari

Adv. MURARI SINGH

Respondent(s)

Birendra Sah and Others

Prayag Sah

Gyanti Devi

Ajay Sah

Shobha Devi

Hearing History

Judge: 12-S.D.J.M.

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-02-2026

HEARING

09-01-2026

HEARING

19-11-2025

HEARING

08-09-2025

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order in criminal case

Summary: The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint petition filed by Poonam Devi against Virendra Sah under Section 226 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the complainant repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple opportunities and court directions, did not produce or examine any witnesses in support of her case, and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the matter, thereby lacking sufficient supporting evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint petition filed by Poonam Devi against Virendra Sah under Section 226 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the complainant repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple opportunities and court directions, did not produce or examine any witnesses in support of her case, and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the matter, thereby lacking sufficient supporting evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CJM Div. Bettiah All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case