BHUKHAL YADAV vs GANGA YADAV — 2564/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,323,324,307,447,354B,379,504,506. Disposed: Uncontested--AWARD on 14th March 2026.
CRI CASE - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: BRWC020030742020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3067/2020
Filing Date
20-06-2020
Registration No
2564/2020
Registration Date
22-06-2020
Court
CJM Div. Bettiah
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE(C.J.M)
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AWARD
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
BETTIAH MUFFASSIL MANUAPOOL
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHUKHAL YADAV
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
GANGA YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE(C.J.M)
Disposed
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 03-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 03-09-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 02-06-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Betia rejected the bail application (dated 07/09/2020) filed by the accused Ganga Yadav, Sandeep Yadav and others, finding the charges against them serious and grave. The accused were charged under IPC sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 447, 354B, 379, 504, and 506 for allegedly abusing the informant, physically assaulting him and his wife with a sickle causing injuries, and extorting ₹40,000, and the court deemed it inappropriate to grant bail given the severity of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Betia rejected the bail application (dated 07/09/2020) filed by the accused Ganga Yadav, Sandeep Yadav and others, finding the charges against them serious and grave. The accused were charged under IPC sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 447, 354B, 379, 504, and 506 for allegedly abusing the informant, physically assaulting him and his wife with a sickle causing injuries, and extorting ₹40,000, and the court deemed it inappropriate to grant bail given the severity of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts