Naima Khatun vs Mafuj Alam — 379/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),316(2),351(1),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed u/s 203 cr.p.c. on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: BRWC020011902025

Filing Number

1173/2025

Filing Date

03-Mar-2025

Registration No

379/2025

Registration Date

03-Mar-2025

Court

CJM Div. Bettiah

Judge

12-S.D.J.M.

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed u/s 203 cr.p.c.

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),316(2),351(1),3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naima Khatun

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mafuj Alam

  2. 2.Geen Mohammad Mian

  3. 3.Muslama Khatoon

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order in criminal caseView PDF

    The Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate at Bettiah dismissed the complaint petition under section 226 of the Bharatiya Nyayasanhita due to lack of prosecution. The court found that the complainant failed to appear despite multiple opportunities and directions to present evidence, and did not examine any witness in support of her case, demonstrating a complete loss of interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    S.D.J.M.

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    S.D.J.M.

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    S.D.J.M.

  6. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    S.D.J.M.

  7. 03-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    S.D.J.M.

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    S.D.J.M.

  9. 17-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    S.D.J.M.

  10. 02-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    S.D.J.M.

  11. 02-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    S.D.J.M.

  12. 03-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 03-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 379/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate at Bettiah dismissed the complaint petition under section 226 of the Bharatiya Nyayasanhita due to lack of prosecution. The court found that the complainant failed to appear despite multiple opportunities and directions to present evidence, and did not examine any witness in support of her case, demonstrating a complete loss of interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case