Akali Devi vs State of Bihar — 3438/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 351(2). 352, 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010132152025
e-Filing Number
22-12-2025
Filing Number
11970/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
3438/2025
Registration Date
22-Dec-2025
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
190
Police Station
BALIGAON
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Akali Devi
Adv. Sujit kumar sharma
-
2.Rinku Devi
Adv. Sujit kumar sharma
-
3.Arvind Ram
Adv. Sujit kumar sharma
-
4.Bhikari Ram
Adv. Sujit kumar sharma
-
5.Bhola Ram
Adv. Sujit kumar sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 3438/2025 Summary The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted anticipatory bail to Akali Devi, Rinku Devi, and Arvind Ram in a land dispute case involving forced watering of crops and alleged assault. The court found general allegations lacking specificity, noted the accused had no criminal record, and observed that the sole documented injury was simple bodyache, while injury reports for other complainants were unavailable despite court directions. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3438/2025
Case 3438/2025 Summary The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted anticipatory bail to Akali Devi, Rinku Devi, and Arvind Ram in a land dispute case involving forced watering of crops and alleged assault. The court found general allegations lacking specificity, noted the accused had no criminal record, and observed that the sole documented injury was simple bodyache, while injury reports for other complainants were unavailable despite court directions. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts