State of Bihar vs Satyam Raj — 802/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRVA010112372022
Filing Number
11234/2022
Filing Date
23-Dec-2022
Registration No
802/2022
Registration Date
23-Dec-2022
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
MAHANAR
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satyam Raj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgment
Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Satyam Raj (S.Tr. 802/2022) Satyam Raj was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping) and 366(A) (abduction). The prosecution alleged he took the informant's 17-year-old daughter Jyoti Priya under false pretenses in 2016. However, the victim's own testimony—that she willingly left with the accused and married him of her own free will—coupled with the informant's admission that he compromised the case after discovering no actual kidnapping occurred, led the court to find the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
19-Mar-2026
Arguments
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
16-Mar-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
21-May-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
21-May-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
20-May-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
15-Feb-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
08-Nov-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
11-Sep-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
17-Jul-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
05-Jun-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
11-Apr-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
14-Mar-2023
Charge
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
02-Mar-2023
Charge
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
14-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 802/2022
Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Satyam Raj (S.Tr. 802/2022) Satyam Raj was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping) and 366(A) (abduction). The prosecution alleged he took the informant's 17-year-old daughter Jyoti Priya under false pretenses in 2016. However, the victim's own testimony—that she willingly left with the accused and married him of her own free will—coupled with the informant's admission that he compromised the case after discovering no actual kidnapping occurred, led the court to find the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts