MINA DEVI vs SITARAM SAHNI — 122/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Miscellaneous

CNR: BRVA010100812025

Filing Number

949/2025

Filing Date

24-Sep-2025

Registration No

122/2025

Registration Date

24-Sep-2025

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MINA DEVI

    Adv. NIRMAL CHANDRA TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SITARAM SAHNI

  2. 2.PARSURAM SAHANI

  3. 3.KESAR DEVI

  4. 4.SANJIT RAI

  5. 5.RAJIV RAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court admitted the application and granted an interim stay on the respondents' petition. The court found merit in the applicant's contentions and ruled that the respondents cannot withdraw the application without the applicant's permission. The court's decision was based on grounds supporting the applicant's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 122/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court admitted the application and granted an interim stay on the respondents' petition. The court found merit in the applicant's contentions and ruled that the respondents cannot withdraw the application without the applicant's permission. The court's decision was based on grounds supporting the applicant's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case