State of Bihar vs Ambika Singh — 427/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,308,379,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRVA010060742024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6069/2024
Filing Date
24-05-2024
Registration No
427/2024
Registration Date
24-05-2024
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0012
Police Station
GAOROL
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Bihar
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Ambika Singh
Sujit singh
Ajeet singh
Geeta devi
keshav kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Vaishali, acquitted all five accused persons—Ambika Singh, Keshav Kumar, Sujit Singh, Ajit Singh, and Geeta Devi—of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 379, and 506/34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the four prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and their testimony did not support the allegations. The court noted the absence of corroborating evidence and the investigator's testimony, leading to the benefit of doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Vaishali, acquitted all five accused persons—Ambika Singh, Keshav Kumar, Sujit Singh, Ajit Singh, and Geeta Devi—of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 379, and 506/34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the four prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and their testimony did not support the allegations. The court noted the absence of corroborating evidence and the investigator's testimony, leading to the benefit of doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts