State of Bihar vs Ambika Singh — 427/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,308,379,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRVA010060742024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6069/2024

Filing Date

24-05-2024

Registration No

427/2024

Registration Date

24-05-2024

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

0012

Police Station

GAOROL

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,308,379,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Bihar

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

Ambika Singh

Sujit singh

Ajeet singh

Geeta devi

keshav kumar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

23-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

02-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

27-02-2026

STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Vaishali, acquitted all five accused persons—Ambika Singh, Keshav Kumar, Sujit Singh, Ajit Singh, and Geeta Devi—of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 379, and 506/34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the four prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and their testimony did not support the allegations. The court noted the absence of corroborating evidence and the investigator's testimony, leading to the benefit of doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

27-05-2024
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Vaishali, acquitted all five accused persons—Ambika Singh, Keshav Kumar, Sujit Singh, Ajit Singh, and Geeta Devi—of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 379, and 506/34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the four prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and their testimony did not support the allegations. The court noted the absence of corroborating evidence and the investigator's testimony, leading to the benefit of doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Vaishali DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case