arun kumar vs State of Bihar — 854/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,64,126(2),115(2),351(2),352.,318(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRVA010028652026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

2551/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

854/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

MAHILA THANA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,64,126(2),115(2),351(2),352.,318(4),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.arun kumar

    Adv. TANWIR ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 854/2026 The District and Sessions Court in Vaishali, Bihar granted anticipatory bail to Arun Kumar in a case involving charges of sexual harassment, coercion, and intimidation under BNS sections 87, 64, 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5), and 318(4). The court found that only abusive language charges were substantiated against the petitioner, while the serious allegations of forced sexual relations made by the complainant were directed against a co-accused (Aaryan Raj), not the petitioner. The bail was approved on condition that the petitioner appear before the lower court within two weeks, furnish two sureties of ₹10,000 each, and present himself on every hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 854/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 854/2026 The District and Sessions Court in Vaishali, Bihar granted anticipatory bail to Arun Kumar in a case involving charges of sexual harassment, coercion, and intimidation under BNS sections 87, 64, 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5), and 318(4). The court found that only abusive language charges were substantiated against the petitioner, while the serious allegations of forced sexual relations made by the complainant were directed against a co-accused (Aaryan Raj), not the petitioner. The bail was approved on condition that the petitioner appear before the lower court within two weeks, furnish two sureties of ₹10,000 each, and present himself on every hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case