RAM PRAVESH MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 346/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),74,,352,132,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRVA010026782026

Filing Number

2390/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

346/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

487

Police Station

VAISHALI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),74,,352,132,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM PRAVESH MAHTO

    Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted Ram Pravesh Mahto's regular bail petition despite charges of obstructing a B.L.O.'s official duty and snatching voter lists during a July 2025 incident in Vaishali. The court's decision was based on the prosecution's failure to submit the case diary despite repeated requests, the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents, his three-month custody period, and the fact that co-accused had already been granted bail. Mahto was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 346/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted Ram Pravesh Mahto's regular bail petition despite charges of obstructing a B.L.O.'s official duty and snatching voter lists during a July 2025 incident in Vaishali. The court's decision was based on the prosecution's failure to submit the case diary despite repeated requests, the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents, his three-month custody period, and the fact that co-accused had already been granted bail. Mahto was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case