MD. AKBAR vs MD. BABLU — 49/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRVA010026342018
Filing Number
49/2018
Filing Date
18-May-2012
Registration No
49/2018
Registration Date
18-May-2012
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
315
Police Station
HAJIPUR TOWN
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. AKBAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MD. BABLU
-
2.MD. IKBAL
-
3.MD. RAJ
-
4.MD. KALAM
-
5.MD. SAHJADE
-
6.MD. KAMAL
-
7.MD. GOLU
-
8.MD. JAMAL
-
9.MD. MUSTKIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Court at Vaishali acquitted all eight accused persons (Md. Kalam, Md. Jamal, Md. Iqbal, Md. Raju, Md. Mustakim, Md. Bablu, Md. Rizwan, and Md. Kamal) of charges under IPC sections 307/149, 324/149, 148, 341/149, and 379/149 on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole eyewitness contradicted himself during cross-examination, admitting he could not identify specific assailants due to crowd conditions and stating he had compromised the case with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
27-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
11-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
27-Jan-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
22-Jan-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
16-Jan-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
16-Aug-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
21-May-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
09-Nov-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
25-Aug-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
13-Jun-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
26-Apr-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
04-Mar-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
03-Mar-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
17-Jan-2023
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
30-Nov-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
15-Oct-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
27-Aug-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
23-Aug-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
23-Jul-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
01-Jul-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
13-May-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th
-
29-Mar-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
10-Feb-2022
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
18-Dec-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
26-Oct-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
26-Aug-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
13-Jul-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
31-May-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
12-Apr-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
01-Apr-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
18-Feb-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
12-Jan-2021
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
03-Dec-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
16-Oct-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
11-Sep-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
07-Aug-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
06-Jul-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
05-Jun-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
02-May-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
21-Mar-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
14-Feb-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
13-Jan-2020
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
04-Dec-2019
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
25-Oct-2019
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
16-Sep-2019
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
06-Aug-2019
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
05-Jul-2019
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
29-May-2019
Evidence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
22-Apr-2019
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
08-Feb-2019
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 8th
-
04-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2018
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Court at Vaishali acquitted all eight accused persons (Md. Kalam, Md. Jamal, Md. Iqbal, Md. Raju, Md. Mustakim, Md. Bablu, Md. Rizwan, and Md. Kamal) of charges under IPC sections 307/149, 324/149, 148, 341/149, and 379/149 on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole eyewitness contradicted himself during cross-examination, admitting he could not identify specific assailants due to crowd conditions and stating he had compromised the case with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts