MOHAN MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 754/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),303(2),3(5),103(1),109(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010026332026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
2348/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
754/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
214
Police Station
JANDAHA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAN MAHTO
Adv. Anju Wala Sinha
-
2.SOHAN MAHTO
-
3.AJAY MAHTO ALIAS AJAY KUMAR MAHTO
-
4.UMESH MAHTO
-
5.DEEPAK MAHTO ALIAS DEEPAK KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 754/2026 Summary The court rejected the interim bail application of Mohan Mahto, Sohan Mahto, and Ajay Mahto (alias Ajay Kumar Mahto). The petitioners were accused of brutally assaulting the informant's son with sticks, bricks, and stones on May 19, 2025, causing grievous injuries and resulting in the victim's death during hospitalization; they also allegedly robbed ₹1.5 lakh and seized the victim's vehicle. Given the serious nature of the charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 3(5), 103(1), and 109(1), the court found that granting interim bail was unjustified and therefore dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 754/2026
Case 754/2026 Summary The court rejected the interim bail application of Mohan Mahto, Sohan Mahto, and Ajay Mahto (alias Ajay Kumar Mahto). The petitioners were accused of brutally assaulting the informant's son with sticks, bricks, and stones on May 19, 2025, causing grievous injuries and resulting in the victim's death during hospitalization; they also allegedly robbed ₹1.5 lakh and seized the victim's vehicle. Given the serious nature of the charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 3(5), 103(1), and 109(1), the court found that granting interim bail was unjustified and therefore dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts