SURENDRA RAI vs State of Bihar — 753/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,74,351,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRVA010026292026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

2344/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

753/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

169

Police Station

RAGHOPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,74,351,352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDRA RAI

    Adv. KUMAR GURAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Surendra Rai v. State of Bihar (753/2026) The Sessions Court, Vaishali granted anticipatory bail to Surendra Rai, accused of assault with an iron rod during a June 2025 incident. The court found the allegations were general and omnibus in nature, the injuries sustained were simple (lacerated wound on the head), and crucially, co-accused persons had already been granted similar anticipatory bail by the same court, placing the petitioner on similar footing. Bail was granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 753/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Surendra Rai v. State of Bihar (753/2026) The Sessions Court, Vaishali granted anticipatory bail to Surendra Rai, accused of assault with an iron rod during a June 2025 incident. The court found the allegations were general and omnibus in nature, the injuries sustained were simple (lacerated wound on the head), and crucially, co-accused persons had already been granted similar anticipatory bail by the same court, placing the petitioner on similar footing. Bail was granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case