LALMNI DEVI vs State of Bihar — 752/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,418. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010026272026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
2342/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
752/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALMNI DEVI
Adv. Parmod kumar singh
-
2.KIRAN DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: A.B.P. No. 752/2026 (Lalmuni Devi & Kiran Devi v. State of Bihar) The Sessions Court in Vaishali granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Lalmuni Devi and Kiran Devi in a case involving charges under IPC sections 406 and 418 (criminal breach of trust and theft). The court found that the complaint lacked material particulars (no khata/khesra numbers of disputed land), co-accused had already received similar bail, and the case stemmed from an underlying civil title suit—making the allegations insufficient to justify arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-May-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 752/2026
Summary: A.B.P. No. 752/2026 (Lalmuni Devi & Kiran Devi v. State of Bihar) The Sessions Court in Vaishali granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Lalmuni Devi and Kiran Devi in a case involving charges under IPC sections 406 and 418 (criminal breach of trust and theft). The court found that the complaint lacked material particulars (no khata/khesra numbers of disputed land), co-accused had already received similar bail, and the case stemmed from an underlying civil title suit—making the allegations insufficient to justify arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts