AMIT SHANKAR KUMAR ALIAS AMIT SHANKAR SHARMA vs State of Bihar — 339/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRVA010026122026
Filing Number
2327/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
339/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
432
Police Station
LALGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIT SHANKAR KUMAR ALIAS AMIT SHANKAR SHARMA
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 339/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Amit Shankar Kumar (alias Amit Shankar Sharma) was GRANTED on 08-04-2026. The court ordered the accused's release on bail upon submission of two bail bonds of ₹10,000 each. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused was involved with other co-accused in an alleged robbery attempt (BNS Act Section 309(4)), the complainant failed to identify him during the identification parade. Given that co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail and no prior bail petition had been filed, the court deemed it appropriate to extend the same relief to this accused under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 339/2026
Case Summary: 339/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Amit Shankar Kumar (alias Amit Shankar Sharma) was GRANTED on 08-04-2026. The court ordered the accused's release on bail upon submission of two bail bonds of ₹10,000 each. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused was involved with other co-accused in an alleged robbery attempt (BNS Act Section 309(4)), the complainant failed to identify him during the identification parade. Given that co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail and no prior bail petition had been filed, the court deemed it appropriate to extend the same relief to this accused under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts