ARUN SING ALIAS ARUN KUMAR SINGH vs State of Bihar — 342/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),76,109,303(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRVA010026092026
Filing Number
2324/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
342/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
KARTAHAN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN SING ALIAS ARUN KUMAR SINGH
Adv. GYANDEEP KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 342/2026 Court Decision: The court granted regular bail to petitioner Arun Singh (alias Arun Kumar Singh) on April 2, 2026, ordering his release on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the subordinate court. Key Reasoning: While the court found that the accused was charged under serious sections (IPC 126(2), 115(2), 76, 109, 303(2), 352, 3(5)) for allegedly participating in a violent assault on January 30, 2026, it determined that bail was justified considering the case facts, arguments from both parties, and case circumstances. The court noted that witness statements did not fully corroborate certain allegations, and the accused had been in judicial custody since February 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 342/2026
Case Summary: 342/2026 Court Decision: The court granted regular bail to petitioner Arun Singh (alias Arun Kumar Singh) on April 2, 2026, ordering his release on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the subordinate court. Key Reasoning: While the court found that the accused was charged under serious sections (IPC 126(2), 115(2), 76, 109, 303(2), 352, 3(5)) for allegedly participating in a violent assault on January 30, 2026, it determined that bail was justified considering the case facts, arguments from both parties, and case circumstances. The court noted that witness statements did not fully corroborate certain allegations, and the accused had been in judicial custody since February 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts