BABLU KUMAR ALIAS BABLU MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 323/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRVA010024702026
Filing Number
2201/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
323/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
214
Police Station
JANDAHA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABLU KUMAR ALIAS BABLU MAHTO
Adv. ANJU WALA SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Principal District and Sessions Court of Vaishali rejected the bail application of Bablu Kumar (s/o Bablu Mehto) who was arrested on 23.02.2026 in connection with FIR No. 214/2025 under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 3(5), 103(1), and 109(1) for allegedly assaulting and robbing a person on 19.05.2025. The court found the charges involving a serious offense (death resulting from injuries), and considering the gravity of the crime and the applicant's active participation, held that granting regular bail would not be just and therefore dismissed the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 323/2026
The Principal District and Sessions Court of Vaishali rejected the bail application of Bablu Kumar (s/o Bablu Mehto) who was arrested on 23.02.2026 in connection with FIR No. 214/2025 under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 3(5), 103(1), and 109(1) for allegedly assaulting and robbing a person on 19.05.2025. The court found the charges involving a serious offense (death resulting from injuries), and considering the gravity of the crime and the applicant's active participation, held that granting regular bail would not be just and therefore dismissed the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts