VIPIN KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 701/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109,303(2),352,351(2),351(3),3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRVA010024602026

Filing Number

2191/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

701/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

37

Police Station

BIDUPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109,303(2),352,351(2),351(3),3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIPIN KUMAR

    Adv. HARENDRA KUMAR SINGH

  2. 2.GOPI KUMAR

  3. 3.PRINCE KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali, granted bail to applicant Vipin Kumar in a Bidupur Police Station case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5), and Arms Act section 27. The court found that while the FIR details serious allegations of group violence and firearms use during a land dispute, the applicant has no criminal history and the case appears to involve a civil land matter. Accordingly, bail was granted on condition of furnishing Rs. 10,000 security with two sureties under CrPC section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 701/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali, granted bail to applicant Vipin Kumar in a Bidupur Police Station case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5), and Arms Act section 27. The court found that while the FIR details serious allegations of group violence and firearms use during a land dispute, the applicant has no criminal history and the case appears to involve a civil land matter. Accordingly, bail was granted on condition of furnishing Rs. 10,000 security with two sureties under CrPC section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case