MAHESH MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 307/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(6),143(3),144(2),64,61(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRVA010023472026
Filing Number
2094/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
307/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
123
Police Station
VAISHALI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH MAHTO
Adv. RAVISH CHANDRA
-
2.SAHUL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court rejected the regular bail application of petitioners Mahesh Mahto and Sahul Kumar, who were arrested on 18.02.2026 in connection with a prostitution case at two hotels in Vaishali. The court found that the petitioners were named in the FIR with specific allegations of involvement in prostitution and being found in suspicious conditions, supported by witness statements and recovered evidence including phones and condoms. Citing the ongoing investigation, Judge Md. Gheyasuddin declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 307/2026
The court rejected the regular bail application of petitioners Mahesh Mahto and Sahul Kumar, who were arrested on 18.02.2026 in connection with a prostitution case at two hotels in Vaishali. The court found that the petitioners were named in the FIR with specific allegations of involvement in prostitution and being found in suspicious conditions, supported by witness statements and recovered evidence including phones and condoms. Citing the ongoing investigation, Judge Md. Gheyasuddin declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts