RAJMANGAL RAI vs State of Bihar — 297/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),117(2),109,303(2),354(B),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRVA010022392026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1999/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
297/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
655
Police Station
BIDUPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJMANGAL RAI
Adv. SRI RAJNISH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted regular bail to 68-year-old Rajmangal Rai, who was accused of assault, criminal intimidation, and theft arising from a land dispute. The court found that the injuries sustained were simple in nature, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and allegations against him were general without specific overt acts attributed to him. Rai was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted regular bail to 68-year-old Rajmangal Rai, who was accused of assault, criminal intimidation, and theft arising from a land dispute. The court found that the injuries sustained were simple in nature, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and allegations against him were general without specific overt acts attributed to him. Rai was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts