RAJMANGAL RAI vs State of Bihar — 297/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),117(2),109,303(2),354(B),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRVA010022392026

Filing Number

1999/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

297/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

655

Police Station

BIDUPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),117(2),109,303(2),354(B),3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJMANGAL RAI

    Adv. SRI RAJNISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted regular bail to 68-year-old Rajmangal Rai, who was accused of assault, criminal intimidation, and theft arising from a land dispute. The court found that the injuries sustained were simple in nature, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and allegations against him were general without specific overt acts attributed to him. Rai was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 297/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted regular bail to 68-year-old Rajmangal Rai, who was accused of assault, criminal intimidation, and theft arising from a land dispute. The court found that the injuries sustained were simple in nature, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and allegations against him were general without specific overt acts attributed to him. Rai was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case