SAROJ KUMAR ALIAS SAROJ KUMAR MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 298/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),329(4),126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),74,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRVA010022382026

Filing Number

1998/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

298/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

VAISHALI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),329(4),126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),74,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAROJ KUMAR ALIAS SAROJ KUMAR MAHTO

    Adv. KUNDAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Saroj Kumar v. State of Bihar (298/2026) The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted regular bail to Saroj Kumar (26), accused of assaulting an informant with an iron rod on 30.12.2025. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, noted the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and considered he had been in custody since 02.02.2026. The court allowed the bail petition and directed his release on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 298/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Saroj Kumar v. State of Bihar (298/2026) The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted regular bail to Saroj Kumar (26), accused of assaulting an informant with an iron rod on 30.12.2025. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, noted the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and considered he had been in custody since 02.02.2026. The court allowed the bail petition and directed his release on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case