YOGENDRA RAI vs State of Bihar — 278/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,103,238,308. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRVA010021292026

Filing Number

1907/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

278/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

860

Police Station

HAJIPUR SADAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,103,238,308

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOGENDRA RAI

    Adv. SUBODH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY The Sessions Judge, Vaishali rejected the regular bail petition of Yogendra Rai, accused of murder and dowry-related offenses in connection with the death of his daughter-in-law Rani Devi. The court found the allegations of heinous nature, noting that the victim was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands, the crime occurred at the accused's matrimonial house, and prosecution witnesses supported the case, warranting continued judicial custody pending investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 278/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Sessions Judge, Vaishali rejected the regular bail petition of Yogendra Rai, accused of murder and dowry-related offenses in connection with the death of his daughter-in-law Rani Devi. The court found the allegations of heinous nature, noting that the victim was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands, the crime occurred at the accused's matrimonial house, and prosecution witnesses supported the case, warranting continued judicial custody pending investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case