KANCHAN KUMARI vs State of Bihar — 566/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117,109,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010020702026
e-Filing Number
19-02-2026
Filing Number
1856/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
566/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
MAHUA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANCHAN KUMARI
Adv. SHASHI BHUSAHN
-
2.SANOJ KUMAR RAI ALIAS SANOJ RAI
-
3.SHIVCHANDRA RAI
-
4.SHIVANI KUMARI
-
5.RAVINDRA RAI
-
6.SUDAMIYA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Court of Sessions Judge, Vaishali partially granted the anticipatory bail application. Four petitioners (Kanchan Kumari, Shivchandra Rai, Shivani Kumari, and Sudamiya Devi) received anticipatory bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and sureties each, as allegations against them were general and unsupported by evidence, and they had no criminal records. However, bail was rejected for Sanoj Kumar Rai and Ravindra Rai, as specific allegations of assault with lathi and iron rod causing head injury and fracture of the right tibia and fibula were corroborated by medical reports and witness testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 566/2026
The Court of Sessions Judge, Vaishali partially granted the anticipatory bail application. Four petitioners (Kanchan Kumari, Shivchandra Rai, Shivani Kumari, and Sudamiya Devi) received anticipatory bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and sureties each, as allegations against them were general and unsupported by evidence, and they had no criminal records. However, bail was rejected for Sanoj Kumar Rai and Ravindra Rai, as specific allegations of assault with lathi and iron rod causing head injury and fracture of the right tibia and fibula were corroborated by medical reports and witness testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts