suraj kumar vs State of Bihar — 533/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121,121(1),117(2),118(2),109,282351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010019642026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
1762/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
533/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
LALGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.suraj kumar
Adv. PRABHAKAR SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Court of Vaishali granted interim bail to four applicants (Harendra Sahni, Suraj Kumar, Rajiv Sahni, and Chandan Sahni) charged under IPC Sections 121, 121(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, and 351(2) for a violent armed conflict resulting in serious injuries to two victims. The court found sufficient prima facie case against the applicants but deemed interim bail justified given the circumstances, requiring each to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. However, bail was rejected for Mantu Kumar Sahni and Nitesh Kumar due to specific allegations of serious violence against them, including sword attacks causing grievous injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 533/2026
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Court of Vaishali granted interim bail to four applicants (Harendra Sahni, Suraj Kumar, Rajiv Sahni, and Chandan Sahni) charged under IPC Sections 121, 121(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, and 351(2) for a violent armed conflict resulting in serious injuries to two victims. The court found sufficient prima facie case against the applicants but deemed interim bail justified given the circumstances, requiring each to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. However, bail was rejected for Mantu Kumar Sahni and Nitesh Kumar due to specific allegations of serious violence against them, including sword attacks causing grievous injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts