suraj kumar vs State of Bihar — 533/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121,121(1),117(2),118(2),109,282351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRVA010019642026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

1762/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

533/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

LALGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121,121(1),117(2),118(2),109,282351(2)

Petitioner(s)

suraj kumar

Adv. PRABHAKAR SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

09-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

HEARING

19-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Court of Vaishali granted interim bail to four applicants (Harendra Sahni, Suraj Kumar, Rajiv Sahni, and Chandan Sahni) charged under IPC Sections 121, 121(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, and 351(2) for a violent armed conflict resulting in serious injuries to two victims. The court found sufficient prima facie case against the applicants but deemed interim bail justified given the circumstances, requiring each to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. However, bail was rejected for Mantu Kumar Sahni and Nitesh Kumar due to specific allegations of serious violence against them, including sword attacks causing grievous injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Court of Vaishali granted interim bail to four applicants (Harendra Sahni, Suraj Kumar, Rajiv Sahni, and Chandan Sahni) charged under IPC Sections 121, 121(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, and 351(2) for a violent armed conflict resulting in serious injuries to two victims. The court found sufficient prima facie case against the applicants but deemed interim bail justified given the circumstances, requiring each to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. However, bail was rejected for Mantu Kumar Sahni and Nitesh Kumar due to specific allegations of serious violence against them, including sword attacks causing grievous injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Vaishali DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case