RAVINDRA KUMAR ALIAS RAVINDRA KUMAR PASWAN vs State of Bihar — 531/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1), 3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRVA010019612026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

1759/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

531/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

865

Police Station

HAJIPUR SADAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDRA KUMAR ALIAS RAVINDRA KUMAR PASWAN

    Adv. PRAGATI KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Court, Vaishali, Hajipur rejected anticipatory bail application No. 531/2026 filed by Ravindra Kumar (age 25) in connection with FIR No. 865/2025 under IPC Sections 103(1) and 3(5). The court found the applicant's arguments unsubstantiated and dismissed the petition, directing him to withdraw the application based on the merits presented by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 531/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Court, Vaishali, Hajipur rejected anticipatory bail application No. 531/2026 filed by Ravindra Kumar (age 25) in connection with FIR No. 865/2025 under IPC Sections 103(1) and 3(5). The court found the applicant's arguments unsubstantiated and dismissed the petition, directing him to withdraw the application based on the merits presented by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case