PANKAJ KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 247/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRVA010019342026

Filing Number

1732/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

247/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

277

Police Station

SARAI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ KUMAR

    Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Vaishali rejected the bail petition of Pankaj Kumar, accused of armed dacoity and criminal intimidation in connection with a shooting incident on December 12, 2024. The court found specific allegations against the petitioner supported by the informant's and witness statements, his confessional admission during investigation, and his two prior criminal antecedents of similar nature, which demonstrated criminal propensity and militated against bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Vaishali rejected the bail petition of Pankaj Kumar, accused of armed dacoity and criminal intimidation in connection with a shooting incident on December 12, 2024. The court found specific allegations against the petitioner supported by the informant's and witness statements, his confessional admission during investigation, and his two prior criminal antecedents of similar nature, which demonstrated criminal propensity and militated against bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case