Rishi Raj vs State of Bihar — 499/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,418. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 05th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010018342026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
1645/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
499/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rishi Raj
Adv. Dilip kumar singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Rishi Raj v. State of Bihar (499/2026) The court rejected Rishi Raj's anticipatory bail application under IPC Sections 406 and 418. The petitioner was accused of defrauding a woman by posing as a government scheme representative, obtaining ₹3 lakh in cash and four cheques worth ₹10 lakh under false pretenses of a women's self-employment scheme offering ₹10 lakh (₹6 lakh first installment, ₹4 lakh second installment) with partial loan forgiveness. The court found the accusations serious, noting the financial breach of trust, and determined that interim bail was not justified given the nature of the offense and available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 499/2026
Case Summary: Rishi Raj v. State of Bihar (499/2026) The court rejected Rishi Raj's anticipatory bail application under IPC Sections 406 and 418. The petitioner was accused of defrauding a woman by posing as a government scheme representative, obtaining ₹3 lakh in cash and four cheques worth ₹10 lakh under false pretenses of a women's self-employment scheme offering ₹10 lakh (₹6 lakh first installment, ₹4 lakh second installment) with partial loan forgiveness. The court found the accusations serious, noting the financial breach of trust, and determined that interim bail was not justified given the nature of the offense and available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts