ABHISHEK KUMAR ALIAS GOLU vs State of Bihar — 452/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(2),110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRVA010016012026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

1441/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

452/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

823

Police Station

HAJIPUR SADAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(2),110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK KUMAR ALIAS GOLU

    Adv. Sudist Prasad Singh

  2. 2.VINAY RAI

    Adv. Sudist Prasad Singh

  3. 3.ARVIND RAI

    Adv. Sudist Prasad Singh

  4. 4.GUNGAN KUMAR

    Adv. Sudist Prasad Singh

  5. 5.SURENDRA RAI

    Adv. Sudist Prasad Singh

  6. 6.GUDDU KUMAR

    Adv. Sudist Prasad Singh

  7. 7.GULSHAN KUMAR

    Adv. Sudist Prasad Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 452/2026 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali, granted interim bail to five of six petitioners (Abhishek Kumar alias Golu, Vinay Rai, Arvind Rai, Gunjan Kumar, and Surendra Rai) on the condition of furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 each with two sureties under CrPC Section 482(2). The bail application of Guddu Kumar was dismissed as withdrawn by his counsel. The charges include assault, criminal intimidation, and related offenses under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 110, 303(2), 352, and 351(2). Key Reasoning: The court found that while the FIR relates to a violent altercation on October 22, 2025 involving the petitioners allegedly attacking the informant, medical evidence recorded only simple injuries, and witness statements failed to corroborate claims regarding specific serious injuries or theft mentioned in the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 452/2026 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali, granted interim bail to five of six petitioners (Abhishek Kumar alias Golu, Vinay Rai, Arvind Rai, Gunjan Kumar, and Surendra Rai) on the condition of furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 each with two sureties under CrPC Section 482(2). The bail application of Guddu Kumar was dismissed as withdrawn by his counsel. The charges include assault, criminal intimidation, and related offenses under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 110, 303(2), 352, and 351(2). Key Reasoning: The court found that while the FIR relates to a violent altercation on October 22, 2025 involving the petitioners allegedly attacking the informant, medical evidence recorded only simple injuries, and witness statements failed to corroborate claims regarding specific serious injuries or theft mentioned in the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case