HARENDRA SAHNI vs State of Bihar — 437/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121,121(1),117(2),118(2),109,352,351. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRVA010014782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-02-2026

Filing Number

1329/2026

Filing Date

07-02-2026

Registration No

437/2026

Registration Date

07-02-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

LALGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121,121(1),117(2),118(2),109,352,351

Petitioner(s)

HARENDRA SAHNI

Adv. santosh kumar

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

09-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali, decided four interim bail applications arising from FIR No. 46/2026 under IPC sections 121, 121(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, and 351(2). The court granted interim bail to applicants Harendra Sahni, Suraj Kumar, Rajiv Sahni, and Chandan Sahni (alias Chandan Kumar) on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, as they were found to be sufficiently involved in the alleged mob violence but the evidence against two of the accused (Mantu Kumar Sahni and Nirtesh Kumar) for specific serious injuries warranted their bail rejection pending regular bail proceedings before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali, decided four interim bail applications arising from FIR No. 46/2026 under IPC sections 121, 121(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, and 351(2). The court granted interim bail to applicants Harendra Sahni, Suraj Kumar, Rajiv Sahni, and Chandan Sahni (alias Chandan Kumar) on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, as they were found to be sufficiently involved in the alleged mob violence but the evidence against two of the accused (Mantu Kumar Sahni and Nirtesh Kumar) for specific serious injuries warranted their bail rejection pending regular bail proceedings before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Vaishali DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case