MD Imran vs State of Bihar — 422/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69,89,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010014752026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
1326/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
422/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
88
Police Station
MAHILA THANA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD Imran
Adv. Krishna kumar singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 422/2026 Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected MD Imran's anticipatory bail petition in a rape case. The court found specific allegations that Imran engaged in sexual relations with the informant under false pretense of marriage for seven years, refused marriage, threatened her family, and caused two miscarriages. Supporting witness statements and medical evidence corroborated the allegations, leading the court to conclude it was not a fit case for anticipatory bail while investigation was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 422/2026
Case 422/2026 Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected MD Imran's anticipatory bail petition in a rape case. The court found specific allegations that Imran engaged in sexual relations with the informant under false pretense of marriage for seven years, refused marriage, threatened her family, and caused two miscarriages. Supporting witness statements and medical evidence corroborated the allegations, leading the court to conclude it was not a fit case for anticipatory bail while investigation was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts