BHUWNESHWAR THAKUR BHUNESHWAR THAKUR vs State of Bihar — 402/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010012852026
e-Filing Number
05-02-2026
Filing Number
1140/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
402/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
164
Police Station
SARAI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHUWNESHWAR THAKUR BHUNESHWAR THAKUR
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR SHARMA
-
2.PRINCE KUMAR
-
3.KUMKUM DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted interim bail to the three petitioners (Bhuwneshwar Thakur, Prince Kumar, and Kumkum Devi) accused under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, and 3(5) in a case involving assault with weapons during a land dispute. The court found that both parties had settled their differences, that witness statements corroborated the land dispute between the parties, and that the accused had no criminal history, making interim bail justified. The petitioners were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount under CrPC 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 402/2026
The court granted interim bail to the three petitioners (Bhuwneshwar Thakur, Prince Kumar, and Kumkum Devi) accused under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, and 3(5) in a case involving assault with weapons during a land dispute. The court found that both parties had settled their differences, that witness statements corroborated the land dispute between the parties, and that the accused had no criminal history, making interim bail justified. The petitioners were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount under CrPC 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts