CHHOTU KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 174/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,511. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRVA010011272026

Filing Number

1000/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

174/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

594

Police Station

HAJIPUR TOWN

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,511

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHOTU KUMAR

    Adv. RAMAKANT BHARTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge-II, Vaishali at Hajipur granted regular bail to Chhotu Kumar in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 457, 380, and 511 (burglary and theft). The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering that charges had been framed, he had no criminal antecedents, and had previously been granted bail by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Order

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 174/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge-II, Vaishali at Hajipur granted regular bail to Chhotu Kumar in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 457, 380, and 511 (burglary and theft). The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering that charges had been framed, he had no criminal antecedents, and had previously been granted bail by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case