ARUN KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 109/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRVA010002742026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
242/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
Vaishali DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1462
Police Station
HAJIPUR TOWN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN KUMAR
Adv. Manoranjan Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted anticipatory bail to Arun Kumar in a case involving allegations of assault, unlicensed firearm use, and harassment. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary because: (1) the alleged firearm was a licensed weapon belonging to the petitioner; (2) no injury reports documented harm to the alleged victim despite assault allegations; (3) CCTV evidence was incomplete with deleted footage; and (4) the petitioner himself sustained injuries. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2026
Case Summary The Sessions Judge, Vaishali granted anticipatory bail to Arun Kumar in a case involving allegations of assault, unlicensed firearm use, and harassment. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary because: (1) the alleged firearm was a licensed weapon belonging to the petitioner; (2) no injury reports documented harm to the alleged victim despite assault allegations; (3) CCTV evidence was incomplete with deleted footage; and (4) the petitioner himself sustained injuries. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts