Deepak Kumar vs State of Bihar — 30/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26,35. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRVA010000512026

e-Filing Number

02-01-2026

Filing Number

47/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

Vaishali DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

545

Police Station

VAISHALI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Deepak Kumar

    Adv. Ratan kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 30/2026 Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Court, Vaishali dismissed Deepak Kumar's interim bail application after finding no involvement in the underlying FIR (Vaishali PS Case 545/2025) under Sections 25(1-b), 26, and 35 of the Arms Act. The court allowed Kumar to withdraw his bail petition based on his counsel's submission that investigation revealed no culpability, with both the defense and prosecution agreeing to the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 30/2026 Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Court, Vaishali dismissed Deepak Kumar's interim bail application after finding no involvement in the underlying FIR (Vaishali PS Case 545/2025) under Sections 25(1-b), 26, and 35 of the Arms Act. The court allowed Kumar to withdraw his bail petition based on his counsel's submission that investigation revealed no culpability, with both the defense and prosecution agreeing to the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case