PHOOLCHAND SAH vs REENA DEVI — 208/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9RULE9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Mislaneous

CNR: BRSW120039022025

Filing Number

3902/2025

Filing Date

07-Jan-2020

Registration No

208/2025

Registration Date

07-Jan-2020

Court

Maharajganj Civil Division

Judge

1-Civil Judge Sr.Division

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9RULE9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PHOOLCHAND SAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REENA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Maharajganj dismissed the miscellaneous case filed by Phool Chand Sah & Others against Reena Devi & Others for default due to non-appearance of the applicants on 10.03.2026. The court found that despite being granted multiple indulgences over several hearings, the applicants consistently failed to appear or file proper pleadings, demonstrating loss of interest in pursuing the suit. All pending applications were disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr.Division

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Civil Judge Sr.Division

  5. 12-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Maharajganj dismissed the miscellaneous case filed by Phool Chand Sah & Others against Reena Devi & Others for default due to non-appearance of the applicants on 10.03.2026. The court found that despite being granted multiple indulgences over several hearings, the applicants consistently failed to appear or file proper pleadings, demonstrating loss of interest in pursuing the suit. All pending applications were disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case