SATYENDRA SINGH vs State of Bihar — 264/2025

The Sessions Judge allowed the revision petition and set aside the lower court's order that had rejected the accused's defence witnesses as improper evidence. The court held that filing an application under Section 243 CrPC to compel witness attendance is not mandatory when the defence can secure witness presence itself, and defence evidence cannot be rejected merely because witnesses are not charge-sheeted. The trial court was directed to complete the trial within three months with strict timelines for examining remaining witnesses and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.