SURENDRA SAH vs STATE OF BIHAR — 446/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSW010052542026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

4850/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

446/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Court

DJ Div. Siwan

Judge

1-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

PANCHRUKHI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,3(5)
Arms Act Section 25(1-b)(i),26,27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDRA SAH

    Adv. Sudhir kumar Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    orderView PDF

    Summary of Case 446/2026 The court rejected Surendra Sah's bail petition in a firearms and criminal intimidation case. Although the petitioner had been previously granted provisional bail (April 27-May 3, 2026), he surrendered to the lower court three days late (May 7 instead of May 4) and flagrantly violated the court's directions, leading Judge Motish Kumar Singh to deny the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 13-May-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 07-May-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 446/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 446/2026 The court rejected Surendra Sah's bail petition in a firearms and criminal intimidation case. Although the petitioner had been previously granted provisional bail (April 27-May 3, 2026), he surrendered to the lower court three days late (May 7 instead of May 4) and flagrantly violated the court's directions, leading Judge Motish Kumar Singh to deny the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case