RITA KUMARI vs state of BIHAR — 857/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 420,467,468,471,120B. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSW010045602026
e-Filing Number
02-04-2026
Filing Number
4212/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
857/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
1-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
DARAULI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RITA KUMARI
Adv. BIGU KUMAR GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
orderView PDF
Case 857/2026 Summary: Rita Kumari's anticipatory bail petition was rejected by Sessions Judge Motish Kumar Singh on 26.05.2026. Kumari was accused of submitting forged intermediate educational certificates to obtain employment as a contractual Panchayat teacher in 2007, charges registered under IPC sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), and 420. The court rejected bail citing the gravity of the forgery offense and ongoing investigation, despite the petitioner's clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Session Judge
-
22-May-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
16-May-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
15-May-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
02-May-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 857/2026
Case 857/2026 Summary: Rita Kumari's anticipatory bail petition was rejected by Sessions Judge Motish Kumar Singh on 26.05.2026. Kumari was accused of submitting forged intermediate educational certificates to obtain employment as a contractual Panchayat teacher in 2007, charges registered under IPC sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), and 420. The court rejected bail citing the gravity of the forgery offense and ongoing investigation, despite the petitioner's clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts