SONU MANJHI vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSW010038142026

e-Filing Number

15-03-2026

Filing Number

3526/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Siwan

Judge

24-District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

116

Police Station

ASAWAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,103(1),3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONU MANJHI

    Adv. Brijraj Kumar parasar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

    The court rejected Sonu Manjhi's bail application in Case 316/2026 arising from Asaon police station FIR 116/2025. Manjhi was accused of firing a pistol at Rahul Sahni, causing fatal injuries, under charges including murder and criminal intimidation under the IPC and Arms Act. The court found the charges to be serious in nature and determined that bail was not warranted given the gravity of the offense and the specific allegation that Manjhi directly fired the fatal shot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Sonu Manjhi's bail application in Case 316/2026 arising from Asaon police station FIR 116/2025. Manjhi was accused of firing a pistol at Rahul Sahni, causing fatal injuries, under charges including murder and criminal intimidation under the IPC and Arms Act. The court found the charges to be serious in nature and determined that bail was not warranted given the gravity of the offense and the specific allegation that Manjhi directly fired the fatal shot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case