STATE THROUGH MONU KUMAR MAHTO vs BENGALI MAHTO AND ORS — 312/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,308,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSW010037422022
Filing Number
3585/2022
Filing Date
24-Jun-2022
Registration No
312/2022
Registration Date
24-Jun-2022
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
23-Additional District and Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE THROUGH MONU KUMAR MAHTO
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BENGALI MAHTO AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-III in Siwan acquitted all four defendants (Bangali Mahto, Manju Devi, Seema Devi, and Kalwati Devi) of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 324, 308, and 504/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that prosecution witnesses lacked credible knowledge of the incident, the police officer witness contradicted himself regarding the complaint document, and without corroborating evidence or medical testimony, the charges could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge-III
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Additional District and Sessions Judge-III
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge-III
-
23-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Additional District and Sessions Judge-III
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-III
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-III
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
30-May-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
25-Sep-2024
Charge
Additional District and Sessions Judge-X
-
13-Aug-2024
Charge
-
01-Jul-2024
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
16-May-2024
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
28-Mar-2024
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
07-Feb-2024
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
22-Dec-2023
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
08-Nov-2023
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
16-Sep-2023
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
28-Jul-2023
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
07-Jun-2023
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
13-Apr-2023
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
01-Mar-2023
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
30-Jan-2023
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
15-Nov-2022
Charge
Asstt Session Judge Second
-
18-Oct-2022
Charge
Principal District and Session Judge
-
16-Sep-2022
Charge
Principal District and Session Judge
-
17-Aug-2022
Charge
Principal District and Session Judge
-
14-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 312/2022
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-III in Siwan acquitted all four defendants (Bangali Mahto, Manju Devi, Seema Devi, and Kalwati Devi) of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 324, 308, and 504/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that prosecution witnesses lacked credible knowledge of the incident, the police officer witness contradicted himself regarding the complaint document, and without corroborating evidence or medical testimony, the charges could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts